Georgia Casualty Co. v. James

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Georgia Casualty Co. v. James

122 S.E. 651, 32 Ga. App. 99, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 294

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 19, 1924

Docket14908

StatusPublished

This text of 122 S.E. 651 (Georgia Casualty Co. v. James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia Casualty Co. v. James, 122 S.E. 651, 32 Ga. App. 99, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 294 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

This was a case of admitted liability for partial dependency by a mother of several minor children on account of the death of a son and brother who contributed to their support. The evidence showed that the father was an invalid. Petitioners were allowed $4.75 weekly compensation during the period of indemnity. Plaintiffs in error contend that not quite all of the award was authorized by the evidence. Held: The judgment of the industrial commissioner, sustained by the commission as a whole and by the judge of the superior court on appeal, appears to have been painstakingly arrived at, and is sustainable under several theories of the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jenkins, P. J.

This was a case of admitted liability for partial dependency by a mother of several minor children on account of the death of a son and brother who contributed to their support. The evidence showed that the father was an invalid. Petitioners were allowed $4.75 weekly compensation during the period of indemnity. Plaintiffs in error contend that not quite all of the award was authorized by the evidence. Held: The judgment of the industrial commissioner, sustained by the commission as a whole and by the judge of the superior court on appeal, appears to have been painstakingly arrived at, and is sustainable under several theories of the evidence.

Judgment affirmed.

Stephens and Bell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 S.E. 651, 32 Ga. App. 99, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 294, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-casualty-co-v-james-gactapp-1924.