Georgia and Forida Inland Steamboat Co. v. Mercier

Supreme Court of Georgia

Georgia and Forida Inland Steamboat Co. v. Mercier

1 Ga. L. Rep. 366

DecidedJuly 1, 1886

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 366 (Georgia and Forida Inland Steamboat Co. v. Mercier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Georgia and Forida Inland Steamboat Co. v. Mercier, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 366 (Ga. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

.Hall, J.

Although the preponderance of the evidence may appear [367]*367to be against the verdict, yet where there is enough to support the finding and the presiding judge refuses to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to law and evidence, this court will not interfere to control his discretion.

J. J. Abrams, for plaintiff in error. Lester & Ravenel, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

.Hall, J.

Although the preponderance of the evidence may appear [367]*367to be against the verdict, yet where there is enough to support the finding and the presiding judge refuses to grant a new trial on the ground that the verdict is contrary to law and evidence, this court will not interfere to control his discretion.

J. J. Abrams, for plaintiff in error. Lester & Ravenel, for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Ga. L. Rep. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-and-forida-inland-steamboat-co-v-mercier-ga-1886.