Georgia & Alabama Railway v. Pattison

37 S.E. 766, 112 Ga. 468, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 204
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 20, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 37 S.E. 766 (Georgia & Alabama Railway v. Pattison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Georgia & Alabama Railway v. Pattison, 37 S.E. 766, 112 Ga. 468, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 204 (Ga. 1900).

Opinion

Lewis, J.

1. This case, even taking the evidence most favorably for the plaintiff below, falls squarely, as to questions of law by which it should be absolutely controlled, within the principles laid down by this court in the case of Georgia & Alabama Ry. v. Pound, 111 Ga. 6. Since at the trial now under review those principies 'were not applied and followed, there must be a new trial, the result of. which, if the testimony be substantially the same, should be in favor of the railway company.

2. Upon the facts disclosed by the record, there was no error in refusing to dismiss the motion for a new trial.

Judgment on main bill of exceptions reversed; on cross-bill affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Georgia & Alabama Railway v. Pound
36 S.E. 312 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1900)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 S.E. 766, 112 Ga. 468, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgia-alabama-railway-v-pattison-ga-1900.