Georgetown Steel Co. v. United States

2009 CIT 25

• Court: United States Court of International Trade
• Decided: April 1, 2009
• Docket: 02-00739
• Status: Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 09 - 25

A M E N D E D J U D G M E N T

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr., Senior Judge

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x

GEORGETOWN STEEL COMPANY, LLC et al., :

Plaintiffs, :

v. : Court No. 02-00739

UNITED STATES, :

Defendant. :

The court having entered judgment dismissing this action

pursuant to its slip opinion 05-43, 29 CIT 373 (April 1, 2005); and

the plaintiffs having interposed a motion for rehearing; and the

court having granted that motion to the extent of vacation of the

judgment of dismissal herein pending entry of final judgment in

Court No. 01-00955, a related action then sub nom. Co-Steel

Raritan, Inc. et al. v. U.S. Int’l Trade Comm’n; and the court in

conjunction with the grant of plaintiffs’ motion having issued slip

opinions 07-7, 31 CIT (Jan. 17, 2007), and 07-165, 31 CIT

(Nov. 8, 2007), remanding that related matter to the defendant

International Trade Commission; and that defendant having filed the

results of that remand, which have been affirmed by the court

pursuant to its slip opinion 08-130, 32 CIT (Nov. 25, 2008), Court No. 02-00739 Page 2

sub nom. Gerdau Ameristeel U.S. Inc. et al. v. U.S. Int’l Trade

Comm’n; and the intervenor-defendant Saarstahl AG in the above-

encaptioned action having now interposed a motion for summary

judgment pursuant to the court’s slip opinion 05-43 herein and the

final judgment of affirmance entered in Court No. 01-00955 pursuant

to slip opinion 08-130; and neither the plaintiffs nor the

defendant or other intervenor-defendants having interposed any

opposition to that motion; Now therefore, after due deliberation,

it is

ORDERED that the motion of intervenor-defendant Saarstahl

AG for summary judgment be, and it hereby is, granted; and it is

further

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of

dismissal of this action on April 1, 2005 be, and it hereby is,

reinstated.

Dated: New York, New York April 1, 2009

/s/ Thomas J. Aquilino, Jr. Senior Judge