Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.

694 F. App'x 810
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.. Read the opinion of the Court — 867 F.3d 1229
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided August 1, 2017·No. 2016-2297·Published

Opinion

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Per Curiam.

Because the record in this case contains extensive material marked as confidential, the court has issued its opinion dated August 1, 2017 under seal. The court does not believe, however, that the opinion contains confidential material.

The parties are hereby ordered to show cause, by means of a single joint response coordinated among the parties, why the opinion should not be unsealed. The response to this order must specify which words, if any, are proposed to be redacted, and must specifically state the cause for each such requested redaction. If the parties propose redactions, the response to this order must also propose specific words to replace each of the proposed redactions in an unsealed opinion. The joint response shall be filed no later than August 15, 2017.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P., 694 F. App'x 810 (Fed. Cir. 2017).

694 F. App'x 810 (Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.