Georgetown County v. Davis & Floyd
This text of Georgetown County v. Davis & Floyd (Georgetown County v. Davis & Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Supreme Court
Georgetown County, Petitioner,
v.
Davis & Floyd, Inc., Republic Contracting Corporation, S&ME, Inc., the South Carolina Department of Transportation and the City of Georgetown, Defendants,
Of whom the South Carolina Department of Transportation and the City of Georgetown are the Respondents.
Appellate Case No. 2019-000705
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS
Appeal from Georgetown County Larry B. Hyman Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Opinion No. 27976 Heard May 21, 2020 – Filed June 3, 2020
CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED
Louis H. Lang, Richard C. Detwiler, and Harry A. Dixon, of Callison Tighe & Robinson, LLC, all of Columbia, for Petitioner. David Leon Morrison, of Morrison Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for the City of Georgetown; Lisa A. Reynolds, of Anderson Reynolds & Stephens, LLC, of Charleston, for the South Carolina Department of Transportation.
PER CURIAM: We granted Georgetown County's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Georgetown County v. Davis & Floyd, Inc., 426 S.C. 52, 824 S.E.2d 471 (Ct. App. 2019). We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.
DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.
BEATTY, C.J., KITTREDGE, HEARN, FEW and JAMES, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Georgetown County v. Davis & Floyd, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georgetown-county-v-davis-floyd-sc-2020.