George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc.

819 So. 2d 233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8170, 2002 WL 1174387

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 5, 2002

DocketNo. 4D01-3043

StatusPublished

This text of 819 So. 2d 233 (George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George's Crane Service, Inc. v. Signal Service Industries, Inc., 819 So. 2d 233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8170, 2002 WL 1174387 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee’s renewed motion for directed verdict and entering final judgment. We agree with the trial court that the indemnification agreement did not meet the requirements of section 725.06(2), Florida Statutes (1999), since it did not give a “specific consideration” for the indemnification that was “provided for” in the contract.

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order granting appellee’s renewed motion for directed verdict and entering final judgment. We agree with the trial court that the indemnification agreement did not meet the requirements of section 725.06(2), Florida Statutes (1999), since it did not give a “specific consideration” for the indemnification that was “provided for” in the contract.

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

819 So. 2d 233, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 8170, 2002 WL 1174387, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/georges-crane-service-inc-v-signal-service-industries-inc-fladistctapp-2002.