George Willard Shaffer v. United States

435 F.2d 168
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 4, 1970·No. 25237_1·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On June 28, 1965, Shaffer entered a plea of guilty to a charge of acquiring marihuana without paying the transfer tax, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a). Thereafter, he commenced this proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, to vacate the judgment of conviction. The keystone of his contention was and is that “the incriminatory portion of § 4744(a) was declared unconstitutional in Leary * * Leary v. United States, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969). The district court denied relief and Shaffer has appealed. We affirm.

Shaffer apparently recognizes that the Supreme Court did not in Leary strike down the marihuana tax statute [26 USC § 4741(a)] as unconstitutional on its face, but he fails to realize that, having entered a plea of guilty to a charge of violating the statute, he cannot now assert that the statute was unconstitutional as applied to him. A fortiori, where as here, his plea was counseled. See Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742, 90 S.Ct. 1463, 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Willard Shaffer v. United States, 435 F.2d 168 (9th Cir. 1970).

435 F.2d 168 (George Willard Shaffer v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Crocker
789 P.2d 186 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1990)
Carrion v. United States
350 F. Supp. 102 (C.D. California, 1972)
Alaway v. United States
329 F. Supp. 78 (C.D. California, 1971)