George W. Miller v. AMR Corp.

Eighth Circuit

George W. Miller v. AMR Corp.

214 F. App'x 636

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 5, 2007

Docket06-1037

StatusUnpublished

This text of 214 F. App'x 636 (George W. Miller v. AMR Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George W. Miller v. AMR Corp., 214 F. App'x 636 (8th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

George W. Miller appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his civil action against AMR Corporation. Upon de novo review, see Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch. Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir.1998), we conclude that the district court’s dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

George W. Miller appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) dismissal of his civil action against AMR Corporation. Upon de novo review, see Springdale Educ. Ass’n v. Springdale Sch. Dist., 133 F.3d 649, 651 (8th Cir.1998), we conclude that the district court’s dismissal was appropriate. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 F. App'x 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-w-miller-v-amr-corp-ca8-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack