George W. Hodge v. United States

235 F.2d 85, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3826
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 18, 1956·No. 7219·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a second motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to set aside and vacate a sentence of imprisonment imposed upon conviction of conspiracy to violate the Dyer Vehicle Theft Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, and of the substantive crimes charged as objects of the conspiracy. We affirmed denial of relief upon the first motion. Hodge v. United *86 States, 4 Cir., 217 F.2d 716. The second motion was based upon the contention that the imposition of consecutive sentences on the substantive and conspiracy counts constituted double punishment in violation of the 5th Amendment. The contention is entirely without merit. It is well settled that conspiracy is a crime separate and distinct from the crime which is the object of the conspiracy and that it is separately punishable. United States v. Bayer, 331 U.S. 532, 542, 67 S.Ct. 1394, 91 L.Ed. 1654; Pinkerton v. United States, 328 U.S. 640, 66 S.Ct. 1180, 90 L.Ed. 1489. Furthermore, the conspiracy charged was not confined to the crimes charged in the substantive counts. The motion was properly denied for reasons adequately stated in the order of the District Judge.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George W. Hodge v. United States, 235 F.2d 85, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3826 (4th Cir. 1956).

235 F.2d 85 (George W. Hodge v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pinkerton v. United States
328 U.S. 640 (Supreme Court, 1946)
United States v. Bayer
331 U.S. 532 (Supreme Court, 1947)
George William Hodge v. United States
217 F.2d 716 (Fourth Circuit, 1954)