George W. Hardeman v. The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, Afl-Cio

420 F.2d 485, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2208, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9593
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 22, 1969
Docket28012
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 420 F.2d 485 (George W. Hardeman v. The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, Afl-Cio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George W. Hardeman v. The International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, Afl-Cio, 420 F.2d 485, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2208, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9593 (5th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to Rule 18 of the Rules of this Court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir., 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I; and Huth v. Southern Pacific Company, 5 Cir., 1969, 417 F.2d 526, Part I.

Appellee Hardeman brought this action against the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron Shipbuilders, Blacksmiths, Forgers and Helpers, AFL-CIO, seeking damages under the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act of 1959, 29 U.S.C. § 401 et seq., for unlawful expulsion from the Union. The jury returned a verdict in favor of ap-pellee in the amount of $152,150.00 and the District Court entered a judgment in that amount.

The Union appeals, raising many of the same issues decided against it in International Brotherhood of Boilermakers, etc. v. Braswell, 388 F.2d 193 (5th Cir., 1968), a case arising out of the exact factual situation as that involved in the present case. The Braswell case is dispositive of those issues. We have carefully considered appellant’s other specifications of error and find them to be without merit.

The judgment of the District Court is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
420 F.2d 485, 73 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2208, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-w-hardeman-v-the-international-brotherhood-of-boilermakers-iron-ca5-1969.