George W. Gantt v. Newborne, Librarian Glenn W. Bell, Assistant Attorney General

Fourth Circuit

George W. Gantt v. Newborne, Librarian Glenn W. Bell, Assistant Attorney General

25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20912, 1994 WL 201005

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 19, 1994

Docket94-6147

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1039 (George W. Gantt v. Newborne, Librarian Glenn W. Bell, Assistant Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George W. Gantt v. Newborne, Librarian Glenn W. Bell, Assistant Attorney General, 25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20912, 1994 WL 201005 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

George W. GANTT, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
NEWBORNE, Librarian; Glenn W. Bell, Assistant Attorney
General, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6147.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-94-15-PJM)

George W. Gantt, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Gantt v. Newborne, No. CA-94-15-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 25, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Gantt's motion for appointment of counsel

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1039
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

George W. GANTT, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
NEWBORNE, Librarian; Glenn W. Bell, Assistant Attorney
General, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6147.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 19, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA-94-15-PJM)

George W. Gantt, appellant pro se.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Gantt v. Newborne, No. CA-94-15-PJM (D. Md. Jan. 25, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

We deny Gantt's motion for appointment of counsel

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1039, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20912, 1994 WL 201005, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-w-gantt-v-newborne-librarian-glenn-w-bell-a-ca4-1994.