George W. Emory & Co. v. Commissioners of the Town of Laurel

55 A. 1118, 19 Del. 67, 3 Penne. 67, 1900 Del. LEXIS 55
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided April 6, 1900·No. Mechanics’ Lien No. 2·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

We refuse judgment. This is not the ascertainment of the amount of the liability on the part of a municipal corporation for its own debt, but it is the special condemnation of the particular piece of property in execution, a proceeding in rem, as it were. It is sought here to extend the remedy to municipal property. This the courts will not do, unless it is expressly provided for in the statute.

Judgment refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George W. Emory & Co. v. Commissioners of the Town of Laurel, 55 A. 1118, 19 Del. 67, 3 Penne. 67, 1900 Del. LEXIS 55 (Del. Ct. App. 1900).

55 A. 1118 (George W. Emory & Co. v. Commissioners of the Town of Laurel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayor & Council v. Recony Sales & Engineering Corp.
185 A.2d 68 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1962)
Oliphant v. State Board of Education
126 A. 44 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1924)
City of Boulder v. Stewardson
67 Colo. 582 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1920)