George W. Emory & Co. v. Commissioners of the Town of Laurel

55 A. 1118, 19 Del. 67, 3 Penne. 67, 1900 Del. LEXIS 55
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedApril 6, 1900
DocketMechanics’ Lien No. 2
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 55 A. 1118 (George W. Emory & Co. v. Commissioners of the Town of Laurel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George W. Emory & Co. v. Commissioners of the Town of Laurel, 55 A. 1118, 19 Del. 67, 3 Penne. 67, 1900 Del. LEXIS 55 (Del. Ct. App. 1900).

Opinion

Lore, C. J.:

We refuse judgment. This is not the ascertainment of the amount of the liability on the part of a municipal corporation for its own debt, but it is the special condemnation of the particular piece of property in execution, a proceeding in rem, as it were. It is sought here to extend the remedy to municipal property. This the courts will not do, unless it is expressly provided for in the statute.

Judgment refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mayor & Council v. Recony Sales & Engineering Corp.
185 A.2d 68 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1962)
Oliphant v. State Board of Education
126 A. 44 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1924)
City of Boulder v. Stewardson
67 Colo. 582 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A. 1118, 19 Del. 67, 3 Penne. 67, 1900 Del. LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-w-emory-co-v-commissioners-of-the-town-of-laurel-delsuperct-1900.