George Vickers, Jr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in George Vickers, Jr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI. Read the opinion of the Court — 858 F.3d 841
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided July 18, 2017·No. 15-4012·Published

Opinion

PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________

No. 15-4012 _____________

GEORGE T. VICKERS, JR.

v.

SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI; ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellants _______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (W.D. Pa. No. 2-15-cv-00432) Honorable Robert C. Mitchell, Magistrate Judge _______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

The Clerk has been informed of a typographical error in the opinion which was filed on June 6, 2017. Specifically, counsel for appellant Nicholas Ranjan’s name is misspelled in footnote 1 on page 2 of the opinion. The opinion is hereby amended to correct the misspelling in footnote 1 as follows:

We express our gratitude to David R. Fine and J. Nicholas Ranjan of K&L Gates LLP for accepting this matter pro bono and for the quality of their briefing and argument in this case. Lawyers who act pro bono fulfill the highest service that members of the bar can offer to indigent parties and to the legal profession.

For the Court,

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk

Date: July 18, 2017 kr/cc: George T. Vickers, Jr. Jerome A. Moschetta, Esq. David R. Fine, Esq. J. Nicholas Ranjan, Esq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Vickers, Jr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, (3d Cir. 2017).

George Vickers, Jr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI (George Vickers, Jr. v. Superintendent Graterford SCI) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.