George v. Taylor
884 So. 2d 410, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14627, 2004 WL 2146975
Opinion
The appellants challenge a summary final judgment and final judgment entered in favor of the appellee. Because a number of material facts remain in dispute, and because the appellee has not offered proof conclusively refuting the appellants’ affirmative defenses, see, e.g., Fasano v. Hicks, 667 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), the orders under review are reversed and this case is remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George v. Taylor, 884 So. 2d 410, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14627, 2004 WL 2146975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
884 So. 2d 410 (George v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fasano v. Hicks
667 So. 2d 1033 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)