George v. Taylor

District Court of Appeal of Florida

George v. Taylor

884 So. 2d 410, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14627, 2004 WL 2146975

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 27, 2004

DocketNo. 1D03-2513

StatusPublished

This text of 884 So. 2d 410 (George v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George v. Taylor, 884 So. 2d 410, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14627, 2004 WL 2146975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge a summary final judgment and final judgment entered in favor of the appellee. Because a number of material facts remain in dispute, and because the appellee has not offered proof conclusively refuting the appellants’ affirmative defenses, see, e.g., Fasano v. Hicks, 667 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), the orders under review are reversed and this case is remanded.

ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellants challenge a summary final judgment and final judgment entered in favor of the appellee. Because a number of material facts remain in dispute, and because the appellee has not offered proof conclusively refuting the appellants’ affirmative defenses, see, e.g., Fasano v. Hicks, 667 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996), the orders under review are reversed and this case is remanded.

ERVIN, ALLEN and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

884 So. 2d 410, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14627, 2004 WL 2146975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-taylor-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack