George v. Steam Stone Cutter Co.

U.S. Circuit Court

George v. Steam Stone Cutter Co.

20 F. 478, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236

DecidedMay 29, 1884

StatusPublished

This text of 20 F. 478 (George v. Steam Stone Cutter Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George v. Steam Stone Cutter Co., 20 F. 478, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236 (uscirct 1884).

Pincite

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

This case differs from that of Jones v. Steam Stone Cutter Co., ante 477, in this: that this plaintiff purchased this land of them supposing the title to be good in fee. She made tbe better-ments in reliance upon the title itself. The- attachment was of the land without the betterments. Its force is not abated by the statute, •or these proceedings. If she is within the description of tbe statute, she owns so much of the premises as her betterments have enhanced the value, and the defendant the rest, which is exactly what was attached. If not, ,the defendant owns the whole, according to the common law. The statute declares and enforces a right arising from the natural equity in favor of giving the enhanced value of land to the one who placed it there as an owner. The manner in which the title fails, whether by an unknown lien or a paramount title, is not made any condition. The sole test of the right to the value conferred by the betterments is that they be made by the purchaser of a supposed title in fee. Brown v. Storm, 4 Vt. 37; Whitney v. Richard [479]*479son, 31 Vt. 300. The plaintiff falls within the description, and is entitled ;o judgment in her favor upon this declaration. The better-ments a 'e found to enhance the value of the land to the amount of §1,300. Final judgment in the action of ejectment has not yet been entered, but withheld to preserve the right of the plaintiff there to have tli-! value of the land ascertained by commissioners according to further provision of the statute. Section 1269 et seq. Final judgment w Ü now be entered for the seizin and possession of the promises, \vi ;h six dollars damages, and costs, and judgment for the plaintif on the declaration for betterments for §1,300, value of bet-term eni s.

Exec itions stayed according to section 1266, Eev. Laws Yt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wheeler, J.

This case differs from that of Jones v. Steam Stone Cutter Co., ante 477, in this: that this plaintiff purchased this land of them supposing the title to be good in fee. She made tbe better-ments in reliance upon the title itself. The- attachment was of the land without the betterments. Its force is not abated by the statute, •or these proceedings. If she is within the description of tbe statute, she owns so much of the premises as her betterments have enhanced the value, and the defendant the rest, which is exactly what was attached. If not, ,the defendant owns the whole, according to the common law. The statute declares and enforces a right arising from the natural equity in favor of giving the enhanced value of land to the one who placed it there as an owner. The manner in which the title fails, whether by an unknown lien or a paramount title, is not made any condition. The sole test of the right to the value conferred by the betterments is that they be made by the purchaser of a supposed title in fee. Brown v. Storm, 4 Vt. 37; Whitney v. Richard [479]*479son, 31 Vt. 300. The plaintiff falls within the description, and is entitled ;o judgment in her favor upon this declaration. The better-ments a 'e found to enhance the value of the land to the amount of §1,300. Final judgment in the action of ejectment has not yet been entered, but withheld to preserve the right of the plaintiff there to have tli-! value of the land ascertained by commissioners according to further provision of the statute. Section 1269 et seq. Final judgment w Ü now be entered for the seizin and possession of the promises, \vi ;h six dollars damages, and costs, and judgment for the plaintif on the declaration for betterments for §1,300, value of bet-term eni s.

Exec itions stayed according to section 1266, Eev. Laws Yt.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 F. 478, 1884 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-steam-stone-cutter-co-uscirct-1884.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack