George v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

George v. State

146 S.E. 120, 167 Ga. 532, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 184

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 14, 1928

DocketNo. 6871

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 120 (George v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George v. State, 146 S.E. 120, 167 Ga. 532, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 184 (Ga. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

The principal witness for the State was Albert Calhoun, who was jointly indicted with the plaintiff in error and was an accomplice in the commission of the crime alleged. Under our law pne can not be convicted of crime on the evidence of an accomplice, unless that evidence is corroborated. Penal Code (1910), § 1017. From the evidence set out in the statement of facts it will be seen that the evidence of Albert Calhoun was corroborated. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the- Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The principal witness for the State was Albert Calhoun, who was jointly indicted with the plaintiff in error and was an accomplice in the commission of the crime alleged. Under our law pne can not be convicted of crime on the evidence of an accomplice, unless that evidence is corroborated. Penal Code (1910), § 1017. From the evidence set out in the statement of facts it will be seen that the evidence of Albert Calhoun was corroborated. The verdict was supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the- Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.E. 120, 167 Ga. 532, 1928 Ga. LEXIS 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-state-ga-1928.