George v. State

993 So. 2d 1069, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9370, 2008 WL 2491653
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in George v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14100
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 24, 2008·No. No. 1D06-6724·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence in this appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. Calif., 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

The trial court granted appellant’s motion to correct a probation order to provide that appellant was “found guilty by a jury on November 8, 2006.” The amended probation order still erroneously provides that George “entered a plea of nolo contende-re.” We remand for correction of the probation order in accordance with the trial court’s directive of October 2, 2007. See Smith v. State, 723 So.2d 872 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

KAHN, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George v. State, 993 So. 2d 1069, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 9370, 2008 WL 2491653 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

993 So. 2d 1069 (George v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Smith v. State
723 So. 2d 872 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)