George v. State

779 So. 2d 559, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 527, 2001 WL 62714
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 2001·No. No. 2D00-3854·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bruce George appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice for George to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. [560] See Gibson v. State, 775 So.2d 353 (Fla.2d DCA 2000); Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla.2d DCA 2000) (en banc). We make no comment by this opinion as to whether George would be entitled to relief under rule 3.850.

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and DAVIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George v. State, 779 So. 2d 559, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 527, 2001 WL 62714 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

779 So. 2d 559 (George v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gibson v. State
775 So. 2d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)