Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/George v. State

George v. State

779 So. 2d 559, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 527, 2001 WL 62714
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 26, 2001
DocketNo. 2D00-3854
StatusPublished

This text of 779 So. 2d 559 (George v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George v. State, 779 So. 2d 559, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 527, 2001 WL 62714 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Bruce George appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order without prejudice for George to file a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. [560]*560See Gibson v. State, 775 So.2d 353 (Fla.2d DCA 2000); Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla.2d DCA 2000) (en banc). We make no comment by this opinion as to whether George would be entitled to relief under rule 3.850.

Affirmed.

BLUE, A.C.J., and GREEN and DAVIS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gibson v. State
775 So. 2d 353 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Murphy v. State
773 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
779 So. 2d 559, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 527, 2001 WL 62714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-state-fladistctapp-2001.