George v. State

543 So. 2d 1319, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1351, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3109, 1989 WL 57223
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in George v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 577 So. 2d 996
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 2, 1989·No. No. 87-01758·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court s denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, without prejudice to the appellant raising the issues presented by the supreme court’s decision in Smith v. State, 537 So.2d 982 (Fla.1989), in a motion to correct sentence. See Gibbons v. State, 543 So.2d 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989).

DANAHY, A.C.J., and FRANK and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George v. State, 543 So. 2d 1319, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1351, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3109, 1989 WL 57223 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

543 So. 2d 1319 (George v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
537 So. 2d 982 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)
Gibbons v. State
543 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)