George v. State
106 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 671
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by selling prohibited liquors. The case was tried before the judge 'sitting without a jury. There was ample evidence to support the finding of guilt, and judgment rendered. No prejudicial error appears anywhere, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George v. State, 106 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
106 So. 917 (George v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.