George v. State
106 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 671
This text of 106 So. 917 (George v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George v. State, 106 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 671 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense of violating the prohibition laws by selling prohibited liquors. The case was tried before the judge 'sitting without a jury. There was ample evidence to support the finding of guilt, and judgment rendered. No prejudicial error appears anywhere, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
106 So. 917, 21 Ala. App. 671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-state-alactapp-1926.