George v. Shields
85 S.E. 686, 16 Ga. App. 472, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 86
This text of 85 S.E. 686 (George v. Shields) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George v. Shields, 85 S.E. 686, 16 Ga. App. 472, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 86 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
1. The evidence authorized the verdict.
2. The execution of the instrument sued upon was not brought into question by plea of non est factum, and there was no error in permitting the payee therein named to make proof of the signature thereto attached, and in allowing it to be introduced in evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 S.E. 686, 16 Ga. App. 472, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-shields-gactapp-1915.