George v. Robb
744 S.W.2d 871, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 108, 1988 WL 6307
Opinion
ORDER
This case involves a suit for a deficiency under a promissory note. Respondents [872]*872(plaintiffs below) received a judgment in their favor, entered upon a jury verdict, on their petition to collect the deficiency. Respondents also received a judgment in their favor, entered upon a jury verdict, on appellants’ (defendants below) counter-claim for damages for breach of contract. Following post-trial motions, appellants filed their notice of appeal of both judgments.
The judgments are affirmed. Rule 84.-16(d).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George v. Robb, 744 S.W.2d 871, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 108, 1988 WL 6307 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).
744 S.W.2d 871 (George v. Robb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.