George v. Richardson
21 Va. 230
This text of 21 Va. 230 (George v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George v. Richardson, 21 Va. 230 (Va. Ct. App. 1821).
Opinion
There is no error in the decree to the prejudice of the appellants; but it is erroneous, as it respects the appellee, in allowing interest on the 501. from January 1806, instead of the 1st February 1801. The decree is therefore reversed, as tó this, and affirmed for the residue. Costs are allowed the appellee, as the party substantially prevailing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
21 Va. 230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-richardson-vactapp-1821.