George v. Richardson

21 Va. 230

Opinion

Roane, Judge.

There is no error in the decree to the prejudice of the appellants; but it is erroneous, as it respects the appellee, in allowing interest on the 501. from January 1806, instead of the 1st February 1801. The decree is therefore reversed, as tó this, and affirmed for the residue. Costs are allowed the appellee, as the party substantially prevailing.