George v. Paffen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

George v. Paffen

966 So. 2d 562, 2007 La. LEXIS 2384, 2007 WL 3256596

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 26, 2007

DocketNo. 2007-C-1430

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 966 So. 2d 562 (George v. Paffen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George v. Paffen, 966 So. 2d 562, 2007 La. LEXIS 2384, 2007 WL 3256596 (La. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

In re George, Robin; George, Kenneth M. et al.; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 585-305; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 06-CA-890.

Writ Granted. The plaintiffs have presented evidence that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the land[563]*563lord had knowledge of the dog’s vicious propensities. The appellate court decision to affirm the trial court’s summary judgment is reversed; the trial court’s summary judgment is vacated and set aside; this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this writ disposition.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re George, Robin; George, Kenneth M. et al.; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 585-305; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 06-CA-890.

Writ Granted. The plaintiffs have presented evidence that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the land[563]*563lord had knowledge of the dog’s vicious propensities. The appellate court decision to affirm the trial court’s summary judgment is reversed; the trial court’s summary judgment is vacated and set aside; this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this writ disposition.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

966 So. 2d 562, 2007 La. LEXIS 2384, 2007 WL 3256596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-paffen-la-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack