George v. Paffen

Supreme Court of Louisiana

George v. Paffen

966 So. 2d 562, 2007 La. LEXIS 2384, 2007 WL 3256596

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 26, 2007·No. No. 2007-C-1430·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re George, Robin; George, Kenneth M. et al.; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 585-305; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 06-CA-890.

Writ Granted. The plaintiffs have presented evidence that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the land[563] lord had knowledge of the dog’s vicious propensities. The appellate court decision to affirm the trial court’s summary judgment is reversed; the trial court’s summary judgment is vacated and set aside; this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this writ disposition.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re George, Robin; George, Kenneth M. et al.; — Plaintiffs); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court Div. E, No. 585-305; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 06-CA-890.

Writ Granted. The plaintiffs have presented evidence that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the land[563] lord had knowledge of the dog’s vicious propensities. The appellate court decision to affirm the trial court’s summary judgment is reversed; the trial court’s summary judgment is vacated and set aside; this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this writ disposition.

TRAYLOR, J., would deny. WEIMER, J., would deny.

George v. Paffen, 966 So. 2d 562, 2007 La. LEXIS 2384, 2007 WL 3256596 (La. 2007).

Pincite

966 So. 2d 562 (George v. Paffen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related