George v. Nichols
32 Me. 179
Opinion
orally.—The first objection was obviated by the defendant’s attendance at the taking.
It is not requisite that the magistrate should be a commissioner. It does not appear that he was not authorized by [180] the laws of his State to take depositions. Depositions taken out of the State may be received at the discretion of the court. R. S. c. 133, § 22. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George v. Nichols, 32 Me. 179 (Me. 1850).
32 Me. 179 (George v. Nichols) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Woolridge
78 P. 333 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Brown v. A Raft of Poplar & Oak Timber
1 Handy 13 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1854)