George v. Nichols
32 Me. 179
This text of 32 Me. 179 (George v. Nichols) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George v. Nichols, 32 Me. 179 (Me. 1850).
Opinion
orally.—The first objection was obviated by the defendant’s attendance at the taking.
It is not requisite that the magistrate should be a commissioner. It does not appear that he was not authorized by [180]*180the laws of his State to take depositions. Depositions taken out of the State may be received at the discretion of the court. R. S. c. 133, § 22. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Woolridge
78 P. 333 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1904)
Brown v. A Raft of Poplar & Oak Timber
1 Handy 13 (Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati, 1854)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
32 Me. 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-nichols-me-1850.