George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Co.

170 A. 776, 86 N.H. 596, 1934 N.H. LEXIS 104
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 2, 1934
StatusPublished

This text of 170 A. 776 (George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Co., 170 A. 776, 86 N.H. 596, 1934 N.H. LEXIS 104 (N.H. 1934).

Opinions

Peaslee, C. J.

The case is governed by Thomson v. Company, ante, 436, decided this day.

In so far as the facts differ from those in the earlier case, they are not more favorable to the plaintiff.

Exception overruled.

Branch, J., did not sit: Woodbury, J., concurred in the result: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
170 A. 776, 86 N.H. 596, 1934 N.H. LEXIS 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-morse-malloy-shoe-co-nh-1934.