Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/George v. Millen Fertilizer Co.

George v. Millen Fertilizer Co.

86 S.E. 90, 17 Ga. App. 41, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 246
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 9, 1915
Docket6063
StatusPublished

This text of 86 S.E. 90 (George v. Millen Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George v. Millen Fertilizer Co., 86 S.E. 90, 17 Ga. App. 41, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 246 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The jury passed upon the issues of fact involved, and there was sufficient evidence to support their finding.

2. In the state of the record and construing the charge of the court as a whole, there is no substantial merit in any of the grounds of the motion for a new trial, and the court did not err in overruling the same.

Judgment affirmed.

Complaint; from city court of Milieu — Judge Thomas L. Hill. July 22, 1914. Charles G. Reynolds, A. S. Anderson, for plaintiff in error. William Woodrum, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 S.E. 90, 17 Ga. App. 41, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-millen-fertilizer-co-gactapp-1915.