George v. Meinersmann

Supreme Court of New Jersey

George v. Meinersmann

192 A. 73, 118 N.J.L. 196, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 298

DecidedApril 30, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 192 A. 73 (George v. Meinersmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George v. Meinersmann, 192 A. 73, 118 N.J.L. 196, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 298 (N.J. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case, purporting to be from a judgment of nonsuit, will be dismissed, first, because there is no judgment in the record before us, and, secondly, even if that objection could be overcome, no exception was taken by the appellant to the action of the trial judge in ordering the nonsuit, and so no ground for appeal is available.

The appeal is dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case, purporting to be from a judgment of nonsuit, will be dismissed, first, because there is no judgment in the record before us, and, secondly, even if that objection could be overcome, no exception was taken by the appellant to the action of the trial judge in ordering the nonsuit, and so no ground for appeal is available.

The appeal is dismissed.

For dismissal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, Cole, JJ. 16.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 A. 73, 118 N.J.L. 196, 1937 N.J. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-meinersmann-nj-1937.