George v. Maryland Department of Correctional Service Division of Pretrial Detention Service

Fourth Circuit

George v. Maryland Department of Correctional Service Division of Pretrial Detention Service

615 F. App'x 164

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 9, 2015

DocketNo. 15-1323

StatusPublished

This text of 615 F. App'x 164 (George v. Maryland Department of Correctional Service Division of Pretrial Detention Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George v. Maryland Department of Correctional Service Division of Pretrial Detention Service, 615 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

[165]*165Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Regina M. George appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. George v. Maryland Dep’t of Corr. Ser., No. l:14-cv-02808-WMN, 2015 WL 847416 (D.Md. Feb. 25, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[165]*165Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Regina M. George appeals the district court’s order granting defendant’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. George v. Maryland Dep’t of Corr. Ser., No. l:14-cv-02808-WMN, 2015 WL 847416 (D.Md. Feb. 25, 2015). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

615 F. App'x 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-maryland-department-of-correctional-service-division-of-pretrial-ca4-2015.