George v. Mabus

472 F. App'x 159
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 1, 2012
DocketNo. 12-1254
StatusPublished

This text of 472 F. App'x 159 (George v. Mabus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George v. Mabus, 472 F. App'x 159 (4th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Paula D. George sued her employer, the Secretary of the Navy, alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 2003 & Supp.2011). She appeals the district court’s order granting her employer’s motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. George v. Mabus, No. 4:11-cv-00106-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 13, 2012; Feb. 6, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
472 F. App'x 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-mabus-ca4-2012.