George v. Livingston Parish Bd
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-30647
LARONDA GEORGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
LIVINGSTON PARISH SCHOOL BOARD;
RICK WENTZEL; LOUIS SCHULTZ,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana (U.S.D.C. No. 98-CV-466-B)
September 8, 2000
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Laronda George appeals from the qualified-immunity dismissal of her claims against appellees Rick Wentzel and Louis Schultz. We affirm because no
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
constitutional violation of George’ rights under clearly established law was alleged. See Guidry v. Broussard, 897 F.2d 181 (5th Cir. 1990) (holding that the law was uncertain regarding the extent to which a school principal may censor religious speech in a valedictory address). Appellees were therefore entitled to qualified immunity.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George v. Livingston Parish Bd (George v. Livingston Parish Bd) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.