George v. Ford Motor Co.
This text of 370 F. App'x 251 (George v. Ford Motor Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Lynch, J.) entered May 5, 2009, dismissing plaintiffs’ Complaint in its entirety following the entry of a directed verdict on plaintiffs’ negligence, failure to warn, breach of warranty, and punitive damages claims, and a jury verdict in defendant’s favor on plaintiffs’ strict products liability claim. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of this case.
On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the district court erred in excluding evidence of “other incidents” in which Ford vehicles allegedly experienced acceleration or deceleration problems, and improperly granted a directed verdict on plaintiffs’ negligence, failure to warn, and punitive damages claims. Having carefully considered the parties’ submissions to this Court and the record on appeal, we find all of plaintiffs’ arguments to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
370 F. App'x 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-ford-motor-co-ca2-2010.