George v. Eichen
This text of 51 F. App'x 259 (George v. Eichen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
For the reasons it stated, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying attorney’s fees to objector’s counsel. See Vizcaino v. Microsoft Corp., 290 F.3d 1043, 1051-52 (9th Cir.2002), petition for cert filed, 71 U.S.L.W. 3154 (U.S. Aug. 13, 2002) (No. 02-252). The judgment is AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 F. App'x 259, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-eichen-ca9-2002.