George v. Edward M. Waldron, Inc.
166 A. 102, 111 N.J.L. 4, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 296
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
*6 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, EEeher, Yan Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George v. Edward M. Waldron, Inc., 166 A. 102, 111 N.J.L. 4, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 296 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 102 (George v. Edward M. Waldron, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mixon v. Kalman
37 A.2d 109 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1944)
Matthews v. Township of Woodbridge
183 A. 150 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)