George v. Department of Professional Regulation

432 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20785
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 31, 1983·No. No. 82-1733·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While we agree that the Florida Real Estate Commission had the power to increase the penalty recommended by the hearing officer, see Florida Real Estate Commission v. Webb, 367 So.2d 201 (Fla. 1978), we nevertheless reverse and remand for imposition of an appropriate penalty consistent with the dictates of section 475.-25(1), Florida Statutes (1981), see Linkous v. Department of Professional Regulation, 417 So.2d 802 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George v. Department of Professional Regulation, 432 So. 2d 633, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20785 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

432 So. 2d 633 (George v. Department of Professional Regulation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COM'N v. Webb
367 So. 2d 201 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1978)
Linkous v. DEPARTMENT OF PROF. REG.
417 So. 2d 802 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)