Home/Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court/George v. Commonwealth

George v. Commonwealth

203 N.E.2d 392, 348 Mass. 780, 1964 Mass. LEXIS 990
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedDecember 30, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 203 N.E.2d 392 (George v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George v. Commonwealth, 203 N.E.2d 392, 348 Mass. 780, 1964 Mass. LEXIS 990 (Mass. 1964).

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. A witness with extensive experience since 1931 as owner, manager, broker, developer and appraiser of real estate of all kinds throughout the Commonwealth is not disqualified, as matter of law, from testifying to the value of a parcel of land in Avon, part of which was taken in 1955 for the construction of the Southeast Expressway, by reason of the fact that he had never bought, sold or appraised property in that town and had not viewed the locus until shortly before the trial in 1963. Muzi v. Commonwealth, 335 Mass. 101, 105-106.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chase v. Katz
3 Mass. Supp. 640 (Massachusetts District Court, 1982)
Chase v. Katz
1982 Mass. App. Div. 149 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1982)
Petrell Land Development Corp. v. Commonwealth
231 N.E.2d 565 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 N.E.2d 392, 348 Mass. 780, 1964 Mass. LEXIS 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-commonwealth-mass-1964.