George v. . City of Schenectady
121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 649, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1055
This text of 121 N.E. 869 (George v. . City of Schenectady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
George v. . City of Schenectady, 121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 649, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1055 (N.Y. 1918).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Chase, Hogan, Cardozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Absent: Andrews, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
121 N.E. 869, 224 N.Y. 649, 1918 N.Y. LEXIS 1055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-city-of-schenectady-ny-1918.