George v. Christman, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Christman & Company v. Maristella Compania Naviera, Third-Party v. Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc., Third-Party
This text of 468 F.2d 620 (George v. Christman, Co-Partners Doing Business Under the Name and Style of Christman & Company v. Maristella Compania Naviera, Third-Party v. Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc., Third-Party) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
468 F.2d 620
George V. CHRISTMAN et al., Co-partners doing business under
the name and style of Christman & Company,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
MARISTELLA COMPANIA NAVIERA, Defendant, Third-Party
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BOYD, WEIR & SEWELL, INC., Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 86, Docket 72-1376.
United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.
Argued Oct. 16, 1972.
Decided Oct. 16, 1972.
Nicholas J. Healy, Jr., New York City (Healy & Baillie, William F. Losquadro, New York City, of counsel), for defendant, third-party plaintiff-appellant.
Edward L. Smith, New York City (Kirlin, Campbell & Keating, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.
R. Glenn Bauer, New York City (Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, of counsel), for third-party defendant-appellee.
Before MANSFIELD, OAKES and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
We affirm the judgment of the district court upon the carefully considered opinion of Judge Brieant, reported at 349 F.Supp. 845 (S.D.N.Y.1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
468 F.2d 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-christman-co-partners-doing-business-under-the-name-and-style-of-ca2-1972.