George v. Booth

19 Ohio St. (N.S.) 25
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1869·Published

Opinion

By the Court :

It was no doubt the intention of the legislature that the polls should remain open during the entire day of the election, between the hours specified in the statute for opening and closing; and good policy, as well as the convenience of the voters, would seem to require that this legislative intent should be observed. . But we are not prepared to say that the closing of the polls for the hour spent at dinner, by the officers of the election, in these three townships, under the circumstances disclosed in this record, is, in law, sufficient to invalidate the elections and disfranchise the voters who did deposit their ballots in the boxes. The statute in this respect may be regarded as directory, and a departure from the strict observance of its provisions does not necessarily invalidate the election, where it appears that no fraud has been practised, and no substantial right violated. A case might occur that would require the entire vote of an election precinct to be set aside as invalid, but we are of opinion that this is not such a case.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George v. Booth, 19 Ohio St. (N.S.) 25 (Ohio 1869).

19 Ohio St. (N.S.) 25 (George v. Booth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.