George v. A-Leet Leasing of Florida

556 So. 2d 1230, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 1990 WL 14262
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 21, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2974
StatusPublished

This text of 556 So. 2d 1230 (George v. A-Leet Leasing of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George v. A-Leet Leasing of Florida, 556 So. 2d 1230, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 1990 WL 14262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We hold that the trial court erred in denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss for improper venue. It should have transferred the cause to St. Lucie County. In short plaintiff failed to carry its burden to prove that its election of venue in Broward County was proper. See Air South Inc. v. Spaziano, 547 So.2d 314 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) and Tropicana Products, Inc. v. Shirley, 501 So.2d 1373 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

HERSEY, C.J., and WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tropicana Products, Inc. v. Shirley
501 So. 2d 1373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Air South, Inc. v. Spaziano
547 So. 2d 314 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
556 So. 2d 1230, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1038, 1990 WL 14262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-v-a-leet-leasing-of-florida-fladistctapp-1990.