George Travis Cervenka Jr. v. Karen Marie Cervenka
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00315-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________
GEORGE TRAVIS CERVENKA JR., Appellant,
v.
KAREN MARIE CERVENKA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 25th District Court of Lavaca County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
This matter is before the Court on appellant’s motion to dismiss. Appellant filed a
notice of restricted appeal in error and requests that the case be dismissed.
The Court, having considered the motion, is of the opinion that the motion should
be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, the motion to dismiss is granted,
and the appeal is hereby dismissed. Costs will be taxed against the appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent
agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Because the
appeal is dismissed at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing shall be entertained.
LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice
Delivered and filed on the 28th day of July, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
George Travis Cervenka Jr. v. Karen Marie Cervenka (George Travis Cervenka Jr. v. Karen Marie Cervenka) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.