George Strickland v. Dept. of Corrections

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 2020
Docket19-3991
StatusPublished

This text of George Strickland v. Dept. of Corrections (George Strickland v. Dept. of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Strickland v. Dept. of Corrections, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D19-3991 _____________________________

GEORGE STRICKLAND,

Petitioner,

v.

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

September 29, 2020

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

MAKAR, OSTERHAUS, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ George Strickland, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kelly R. Forren, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
George Strickland v. Dept. of Corrections, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-strickland-v-dept-of-corrections-fladistctapp-2020.