GEORGE STANDFORD PIERCE, JR. v. AMY PIERCE

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 8, 2019·No. 18-0319·Published

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

GEORGE STANFORD PIERCE, JR., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-319 ) AMY PIERCE, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed February 8, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Thomas Ramsberger, Judge.

Jane H. Grossman, St. Petersburg, for Appellant.

Peyton Mullin and Alexa Saab of Meros, Smith, Lazzara, Brennan & Brennan, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sun Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bonura, 95 So. 3d 262,

265 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (recognizing that pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate

Procedure 9.600(a), the circuit court has concurrent jurisdiction with the appellate court

during the pendency of review before the record is docketed to render orders on

procedural matters relating to the case).

CASANUEVA, SILBERMAN, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GEORGE STANDFORD PIERCE, JR. v. AMY PIERCE, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

GEORGE STANDFORD PIERCE, JR. v. AMY PIERCE (GEORGE STANDFORD PIERCE, JR. v. AMY PIERCE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sun Harbor Homeowners' Ass'n v. Bonura
95 So. 3d 262 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)