George & Son v. Jett

87 S.E. 689, 17 Ga. App. 459, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 684
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 10, 1916
Docket6556
StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E. 689 (George & Son v. Jett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George & Son v. Jett, 87 S.E. 689, 17 Ga. App. 459, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 684 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. The plaintiff in certiorari verified the facts alleged in his petition, and also attached thereto the precise affidavit in lieu of bond which is provided for in section 5187 of the Civil Code.

2. The order of the judge of the superior court, directing that the writ of certiorari issue as prayed for, sufficiently indicated the sanction of the petition for certiorari by him.

3. In the state of the record, it does not appear that the judge of the superior court erred in sustaining the certiorari and directing the grant of a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
87 S.E. 689, 17 Ga. App. 459, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-son-v-jett-gactapp-1916.