George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale

Ninth Circuit

George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale

443 F.2d 912, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 436, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9889

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 2, 1971

Docket26731

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 443 F.2d 912 (George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale, 443 F.2d 912, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 436, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9889 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.

The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S.Ct. 926, 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). 1

1

. There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.

The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S.Ct. 926, 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). 1

1

. There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P.

In Re Subpoena Served on the California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation, and California Public Utilities Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant- and California Public Utilities Commission

813 F.2d 1473 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)

Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. Scott

511 F.2d 225 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 F.2d 912, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 436, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-sing-louie-v-robert-carnevale-ca9-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack