George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale

Ninth Circuit

George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale

443 F.2d 912, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 436, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9889

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 2, 1971·No. 26731·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.

The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S.Ct. 926, 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). 1

1

. There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for inspection and copying under Rule 34, Fed.R.Civ.P.

The order being interlocutory, the appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Alexander v. United States, 201 U.S. 117, 26 S.Ct. 356, 50 L.Ed. 686 (1906); Lampman v. United States District Court, 418 F.2d 215 (9th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 919, 90 S.Ct. 926, 25 L.Ed.2d 100 (1970). 1

1

. There is some doubt whether this appeal has been properly docketed. The ruling on this notice of appeal shall not relieve appellant of his duty to properly docket the appeal in the principal action as provided in Rule 12, Fed.R.App.P.

George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale, 443 F.2d 912, 15 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 436, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 9889 (9th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

443 F.2d 912 (George Sing Louie v. Robert Carnevale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

In Re Subpoena Served on the California Public Utilities Commission. Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation, and San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation, and California Public Utilities Commission v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Southern California Edison Company, a California Corporation San Diego Gas & Electric Company, a California Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Defendant- and California Public Utilities Commission

813 F.2d 1473 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)

Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. Scott

511 F.2d 225 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)

Opinion

Related