George S. Riley Jr. Co. v. Byrd

Court of Appeals of Georgia

George S. Riley Jr. Co. v. Byrd

80 S.E. 704, 14 Ga. App. 232, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 187

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 20, 1914

Docket5299

StatusPublished

This text of 80 S.E. 704 (George S. Riley Jr. Co. v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

George S. Riley Jr. Co. v. Byrd, 80 S.E. 704, 14 Ga. App. 232, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 187 (Ga. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Pottle, J.

The evidence authorized the. verdict. The testimony in behalf of the plaintiff was sufficient to authorize a finding that the person to whom the money sued for was paid was the agent of the defendant company, and authorized to receive in its behalf the money to recover which the suit was brought. This issue was fairly submitted to the jury, and, the trial judge having approved their finding in the plaintiff’s favor, this court will not interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pottle, J.

The evidence authorized the. verdict. The testimony in behalf of the plaintiff was sufficient to authorize a finding that the person to whom the money sued for was paid was the agent of the defendant company, and authorized to receive in its behalf the money to recover which the suit was brought. This issue was fairly submitted to the jury, and, the trial judge having approved their finding in the plaintiff’s favor, this court will not interfere. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 S.E. 704, 14 Ga. App. 232, 1914 Ga. App. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-s-riley-jr-co-v-byrd-gactapp-1914.