George S. Chapple III v. State
This text of George S. Chapple III v. State (George S. Chapple III v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00535-CR
George S. CHAPPLE III, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR7642 The Honorable Laura Lee Parker, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: September 26, 2018
DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION
A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of Rule 26 of the Texas Rules of
Appellate Procedure is essential to vest the appellate court with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981
S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998). If an appeal is not timely perfected, an appellate court
does not obtain jurisdiction to address the merits of the appeal and it can take no action other than
to dismiss the appeal. Id.
Here, appellant’s sentence was imposed on October 13, 2017. Because appellant did not
timely file a motion for new trial, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on November 12, 2017. 04-18-00535-CR
TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a)(1). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on
November 27, 2017. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. However, appellant did not file his notice of appeal until
July 30, 2018. Because the notice of appeal in this case was not timely filed, we lack jurisdiction
over this appeal. See Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210; see also Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d
241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (explaining that writ of habeas corpus pursuant to article 11.07 of the
Texas Code of Criminal Procedure governs out-of-time appeals from felony convictions).
We ordered appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of
jurisdiction. Appellant did not respond. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Do not publish
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
George S. Chapple III v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-s-chapple-iii-v-state-texapp-2018.