George Russell, the Ethician Foundation A/K/A the Universal Ethician Foundation, and the Ethician Church v. Waterwood Improvement Association, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedAugust 10, 2023
Docket09-23-00079-CV
StatusPublished

This text of George Russell, the Ethician Foundation A/K/A the Universal Ethician Foundation, and the Ethician Church v. Waterwood Improvement Association, Inc. (George Russell, the Ethician Foundation A/K/A the Universal Ethician Foundation, and the Ethician Church v. Waterwood Improvement Association, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
George Russell, the Ethician Foundation A/K/A the Universal Ethician Foundation, and the Ethician Church v. Waterwood Improvement Association, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2023).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-23-00079-CV __________________

GEORGE RUSSELL, THE ETHICIAN FOUNDATION A/K/A THE UNIVERSAL ETHICIAN FOUNDATION, AND THE ETHICIAN CHURCH, Appellants

V.

WATERWOOD IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee

__________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 411th District Court San Jacinto County, Texas Trial Cause No. CV17,153 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

George Russell, The Ethician Foundation a/k/a The Universal Ethician

Foundation, and The Ethician Church, Appellants, filed a notice of accelerated

appeal of the denial of their motion to dismiss, which was overruled by operation of

law. Before this Court issued an opinion, Waterwood Improvement Association,

Inc., Appellee, filed an agreed motion to set aside the trial court’s interlocutory order

1 and remand the case to the trial court for dismissal of all claims in accordance with

the parties’ settlement agreement.

We grant the agreed motion, set aside the trial court’s interlocutory order

denying the motion to dismiss without reference to the merits, and remand the case

to the trial court for dismissal of all claims in accordance with the parties’ settlement

agreement. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B).

VACATED AND REMANDED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on August 9, 2023 Opinion Delivered August 10, 2023

Before Golemon, C.J., Horton and Wright, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
George Russell, the Ethician Foundation A/K/A the Universal Ethician Foundation, and the Ethician Church v. Waterwood Improvement Association, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/george-russell-the-ethician-foundation-aka-the-universal-ethician-texapp-2023.