George Riscalla and Marjorie A. Riscalla v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

337 F.2d 859, 14 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5892
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 9, 1964·No. 21120·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

‘ The Tax Court held that a per diem •allowance to the appellant taxpayer was taxable income. It was also held that proof was insufficient to sustain a deduction for jobsite transportation expense. The Tax Court’s determination was correct on both issues. Its decision is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

George Riscalla and Marjorie A. Riscalla v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 337 F.2d 859, 14 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5892 (5th Cir. 1964).

337 F.2d 859 (George Riscalla and Marjorie A. Riscalla v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. Commissioner
1989 T.C. Memo. 599 (U.S. Tax Court, 1989)
Lopkoff v. Commissioner
1982 T.C. Memo. 701 (U.S. Tax Court, 1982)